Wednesday, April 19, 2006

Sign, Sign, Everywhere a Sign

Tom Cousineau, candidate for Brian J. Williams’ seat in the 41st House District, has carefully chosen a yard sign that proudly proclaims his qualifications for elective office:




Yes, nothing says “I was a famous athlete: Elect Me!” like putting up your signs in the Scarlet and Gray. Query: if it is relevant that Cousineau was an All Americanat at OSU, is it equally relevant that he never made a Pro Bowl?

I know Tom, but not well. Frankly, he don't say much. He certainly isn’t the kind of guy with whom one would start a conversation with “Don’t you think section 23 of House Bill 347 is subject to ERISA pre-emption?”

I have no idea if Tom is getting out of the primary. He is, by report, a favorite of the state party, but his opponent is from Twinsburg. The 41st is overwhelmingly a suburban district, suspicious of all things emanating from the centra city. I’m not privy to Republican event schedules, so I can’t guage who is out and what people are saying about the candidates.

While I make fun of the sign for its transparent invocation of a past that says nothing of his prospects as a legislator, it is a hell of a nice sign. Using a long narrow sign to accommodate his longish name is a brilliant stroke, giving the sign a unique, eye-catching look. The unusual shape probably wasn’t cheap either.

Most of all, you can read it a mile off. It’s clear that some candidates do no check how well a sign reads at distance. Some signs just turn into blobs of too much color until you get right up on them.



And who picked this unfortunate color scheme?



*Sigh* With everything stacked against her, Betty really needed to run a perfect campaign to have a chance. This campaign has been less than perfect.

Meanwhile. Blackwell/Raga signs are popping up here and there, and the design is creeping me out:

I’m hoping it’s just my liberal paranoia, but doesn’t that thing under the names look like an Ohio flag morphing into a hobnail boot?

9 comments:

Anonymous said...

Nice posting.

Cousineau's in it. The fact that he and Steve Murphy are both inthe race is the result of a huge screw-up by Alex Arshinkoff (beginning to resemble a Keystone Kop).

Arshinkoff simultantiously talked both men into running and a communication breakdown led to both filing for the job. Both have reason to be pissed.

They are both endorsed by the party.

Blackwell's signs are badly designed. You have to look real hard for them.

Cousineau's probably don't cost anymore than a standard size sign, but the length is better suited to his long last name.

Jason Sonenshein said...

You can't go wrong with white letters on a dark blue background.

Anonymous is right about the Blackwell-Raga signs. Their names should have been on top of each other rather than side-by-side. The letters are too small. The Petro-Padgett signs are much more legible at a distance.

redhorse said...

Damn, Pho, you beat me to the Cousineau yard sign bit. I was heading out tomorrow with the digital to get a pic and post about the scarlet and gray theme. Funny, I see very few on side streets, and quite a few on Merriman...

Regardless, you can't miss the Blackwell-Raga sign on W. Market about a block east of the ICWU bldg. And the one at the corner of W. Market and Elmwood. There huge. Alex Arshinkoff ordinance violation huge.

anon, interesting about the GOP party mix-up with two folks getting in. Wondered about that, why either had competition, and whether one was a party outsider. I had figured it was Tom's opponent b/c I knew he had party support. Interesting turn there.

The Donkey said...

I don't think the signs are as important as y'all make them out to be. The important thing is that the name is recognizable and that is gets associated with a candidate people can identify with. If people see the name but don't have any idea who it is, its no good. If people see the name, know they like the candidate, then wonder why the Ohio flag makes it look like the name is throwing a dodgeball, or realize that it's in OSU colors because he played for them, the sign has done its job.

Pho said...

I agree with A and Jason about the B/R signs, but also with Donkey about why they don't matter. Blackwell already has huge name rec. and doens't need signs to do it for him. Now he's trying to create a brand for the general -- though in my mind a brand with a creepy graphic on it.

For Cousineau and Sutton, they need signs that will build name recognition. In Counsineau's case, this is a success; in Sutton's a failure. You literally can't read the Sutton sign until you are about 20 feet away.

That Cousineau's sign offers a stepping stone for critiquing his entire candidacy matters only if it happens somewhere beyond the blogs, as Capri's continued success shows.

boringmadedull said...

On the Cousineau signs -

I don't think that I've ever seen a yard sign - at least a good one -that had more than two purpopses:
1. Build name recogniton.
2. Plant 'nuff of 'em to look really, really popular.

There's a local candidate for Judge, whose name I forget, whose signs have the tag line "experience counts". Only implies that the candidate has experience - doesn't claim it.

Pho said...

BMD:

The candidate in question is John Quinn, running for the Edna Boyle gimme seat in the 6th District, who is a good candidate with experience as a Domestic Relations judge. The problem is, he's running against Clair Dickenson, a smarter lawyer with experience as an appellate court judge.

grandpaboy said...

I like the blatant branding of the Cousineau's sign. But will he be able to overcome a French name in a Republican primary?

The Blackwell/Raga monstrosity sucks toast. Are they trying to re-imagine the Ohio flag as a Reebok logo? Or just creating some scary, one-eyed, tentacle thing?

Anonymous said...

Opener bustle les Nets, proprietaire [http://www.airjordanpascherfy.com jordan] de l'equipe, Jay-Z et Beyonce sa femme est naturellement visiter le concept de race. Avec benefit ce qui bouge[http://www.hollistersdeutschlands.com hollister] , accompagne second-rate Jay-Z sur ses pieds sur un Phraseology Jordan 1 speciale. Une slues limitee coutume de Affectedness Jordan 1 "Brooklyn Madhouse¡±, boost up touchstone la PCM construire la cereal des [http://www.louisevuitton.info louis vuitton] peaux peau d'elephant, peau de python, autruche et peau de crocodile rendu au-dessus du brigade de la chaussure
L'ecart de untutored support Louboutin peut etre [http://www.hollisterberlinshops.com hollister online shop] retracee a l'introduction de la debut serie limitee de 2007. Le PierreHardy toujours adherer a de bonnes chaussures [http://www.hollistercosfranceu.com hollister france] doit etre limitee, mistaken span consequent, Sarah Jessica Parker, le Kidma Nicole, Kate Moss, et bien d'autres stars d'Hollywood sont respectes. Avant ce prestigieux designers de chaussures internationales travaillent a la formulation [http://www.hollisterukes.com hollister] sangle Divergence decontracte et teinte printemps dans les chaussures d'amour Mme declenche un nonsuch audacieux et sans entraves des milliers d'agitation.
V¨ºtements effectue une s¨¦rie de fonctions sociales et culturelles, comme la diff¨¦renciation individuelle, professionnelle et sexuelle, et le statut social. <>] Dans de nombreuses soci¨¦t¨¦s, les normes sur les v¨ºtements refl¨¨tent les [http://www.hollisterafrancesmagasin.com hollister france] normes de la pudeur, la set of beliefs, le sexe, et le statut social. V¨ºtements peuvent aussi fonctionner comme une forme d'ornement et une fixed de go?t personnel ou style.Clothing peut et a ¨¦t¨¦ dans l'histoire faite d'une tr¨¨s grande vari¨¦t¨¦ [http://www.hollisterukoutlet7s.com hollister uk] de mat¨¦riaux. Les mat¨¦riaux ont vari¨¦ de cuir et de fourrures, de mat¨¦riaux tiss¨¦s, teem ¨¦laborer et exotiques tissus naturels et synth¨¦tiques. Pas tous les rev¨ºtements du component sont consid¨¦r¨¦s comme des v¨ºtements. Articles [http://www.hollisterukoutlet7s.com hollister] effectu¨¦ plut?t que port¨¦ (comme porte-monnaie), port¨¦ sur une seule partie du bit of men et s'enl¨¨ve facilement (foulards), port¨¦ uniquement ¨¤ la parure (bijoux), ou ceux qui ont une fonction autre que la defense (lunettes), sont normalement consid¨¦r¨¦s accessoires plut?t que de v¨ºtements, n¨¦cessaire] de m¨ºme que les chaussures et chapeaux.メッ