tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13368104.post2490222680749985935..comments2024-03-06T05:30:41.694-05:00Comments on Pho's Akron Pages: Kevin Coughlin's Fetal PositioningScott Piephohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05849171870929674248noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13368104.post-83674597926470852662007-09-07T12:37:00.000-04:002007-09-07T12:37:00.000-04:00You were right all along to abhor Coughlin. Now w...You were right all along to abhor Coughlin. Now what you get to enjoy is by going after Arshinkoff, the Republicant's will hate him too!<BR/><BR/>I mean who actually likes the conniving worm?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13368104.post-87368648119378955632007-09-07T07:24:00.000-04:002007-09-07T07:24:00.000-04:00I've never seen a better synopsis of Coughlin and ...I've never seen a better synopsis of Coughlin and his cynical brand of politics. Pandering to his perceived base is the only thing the man knows. Throw out some symbolic, do-nothing legislation every four-six months to keep his name in the press is the modus operandi. Any opportunity to put that picture of him and his 'picture perfect, white-bread nuclear familiy' out there as the standard which we should all seek to emulate...spare us your self-righteous crap, Kevin.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13368104.post-88730909843513563632007-09-07T06:55:00.000-04:002007-09-07T06:55:00.000-04:00I don't think you've got this wrong, Pho. I am th...I don't think you've got this wrong, Pho. I am the impossibly "middle of the road" citizen in this ebate. I would never choose abortion for myself but I do not think the governmnet should be sticking their nose in it, either. <BR/><BR/>However, Couglin's bill is pure politics . . . and anyone who can't see that is just not paying attention. Coughlin does not take a step without considering its political implications and I think that is the worst kind of politician. <BR/><BR/>Standing up to Alex A. is the only thing Coughlin has done politically that I can respect . . . however, I am concerned about the implications I am just not yet aware of. <BR/><BR/>Thanks for the insight on this new issue and I hope you will help all of us see the light.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13368104.post-70399508943000827002007-09-07T01:09:00.000-04:002007-09-07T01:09:00.000-04:00Wrong again Pho. It's the fourth o fifth hearing ...Wrong again Pho. <BR/><BR/>It's the fourth o fifth hearing on the bill and it's up for a vote.<BR/><BR/>The bill does nothing to change the definition of a feetus. Everybody is for this bill, even Planned Parenthood. They sent a letter to committee members after reviewing it and expressed their support, specifically pointing out that there is nothing to be alrmed about in the definition section.<BR/><BR/>This bill WILL improve things for a lot of families trying to being closure to the very difficult lose of a child during pregnancy. It's called compassion.<BR/><BR/>And it's a bill that the Pro-Lifers and the Pro-Choicers agree on. <BR/><BR/>As much as you want to paint him as divider, Coughlin's got a good one here.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com